Image courtesy of France Channel
French cinema has occupied a central place in the history of moving images for well over a century. From the Lumière brothers’ first public screenings in 1895 to the innovations of the French New Wave, France has consistently provided cinema with both formal invention and cultural legitimacy. In 2025, when the global marketplace is dominated by Hollywood blockbusters and the algorithmic logic of streaming platforms, the continued relevance of French cinema might appear uncertain. Yet its importance remains visible in three registers: its historical legacy, its ongoing artistic production, and its institutional presence on the world stage.
A Foundational Legacy
French cinema’s claim to relevance begins with its historical role in defining the medium itself. The Lumière brothers’ La Sortie de l’Usine Lumière à Lyon (1895) inaugurated cinema as a collective experience, while Georges Méliès’ Le Voyage dans la Lune (1902) demonstrated the narrative and fantastical potential of the moving image. Later, Jean Renoir’s La Grande Illusion (1937) and Marcel Carné’s Les Enfants du Paradis (1945) consolidated cinema as a vehicle for humanist and poetic reflection.
The French New Wave of the 1960s—embodied by Jean-Luc Godard (À bout de souffle, 1960), François Truffaut (Les Quatre Cents Coups, 1959), and Agnès Varda (Cléo de 5 à 7, 1962)—revolutionised cinematic form. Their embrace of fragmented narrative, handheld camerawork, and self-reflexivity not only reshaped French film but also redefined the possibilities of global cinema.
As André Bazin argued in Qu’est-ce que le cinéma? (What Is Cinema?, 1958–62), cinema’s essence lies in its “ontology of the photographic image,” its ability to preserve and reveal reality. French cinema has long embodied this duality: it documents the everyday while simultaneously experimenting with form. In this respect, French cinema has never ceased to be both historically foundational and formally innovative.
Artistic Vitality in the Contemporary Context
French cinema today sustains a dialectic between formal innovation and audience accessibility. Filmmakers such as Céline Sciamma (Portrait de la jeune fille en feu, 2019) and Ladj Ly (Les Misérables, 2019) exemplify this tension. Both works are deeply rooted in specifically French contexts—gendered subjectivity in Sciamma’s film, suburban unrest and police violence in Ly’s—but their themes of desire, justice, and community resonate far beyond national borders.
In Bazinian terms, these films operate at the intersection of realism and artistry. Sciamma’s insistence on long takes and the absence of a musical score foregrounds the authenticity of lived experience, while Ly’s deployment of documentary-style camerawork situates his narrative within an urgent social reality. Each, in its own way, embodies Bazin’s argument that the cinematic image should “bear witness” to the world while simultaneously shaping it through aesthetic choices.
Institutional Power: Festivals, Awards, and Circulation
The global significance of French cinema is reinforced by its institutional infrastructures. The Cannes Film Festival, established in 1946, remains the most prestigious in the world, functioning simultaneously as a marketplace, a site of critical recognition, and a mechanism for canon formation. French films not only compete but frequently set the terms of critical debate, as with Ducournau’s Titane (Palme d’Or, 2021), which sparked international discussions about genre, gender, and corporeality.
Awards recognition adds further weight. France has submitted more films for the Academy Award for Best International Feature than any other country, with 12 wins to date—including Indochine (1992) and The Artist (2011). Domestically, the César Awards function both as a national showcase and as an international launchpad, giving symbolic capital to works that then circulate abroad.
Transnational Talent and Cultural Exchange
The careers of French actors and directors further sustain French cinema’s international relevance. Isabelle Huppert, described by The New York Times (2020) as one of the greatest actors of the 21st century, exemplifies the global reach of French performance. Her career spans Claude Chabrol’s psychological dramas, Michael Haneke’s La Pianiste (2001), and collaborations with directors from Asia to North America.
Similarly, Léa Seydoux’s trajectory—from Abdellatif Kechiche’s Palme-winning La Vie d’Adèle (2013) to Hollywood blockbusters like Spectre (2015)—demonstrates how French actors traverse auteur cinema and global franchises. On the directorial side, Julia Ducournau’s success evidences how French cinema continues to produce voices that redefine global conversations around genre and spectatorship.
Streaming and the Global Public Sphere
The emergence of streaming platforms has fundamentally altered the circulation of French cinema. Where once access was restricted to festivals, art-house theatres, or academic programs, French films are now available worldwide through platforms such as MUBI, Netflix, and France Channel.
This accessibility not only broadens audiences but also situates French cinema within a transnational cultural sphere. In Bazin’s language, the cinema is a “window onto the world,” and streaming expands this metaphor: French cinema now engages with a genuinely global spectatorship, entering into dialogue with diverse cultural contexts in real time.
Conclusion: French Cinema’s Enduring Relevance
French cinema matters in 2025 because it continues to fulfil three interrelated functions: preserving the history of the medium, sustaining a vibrant and innovative artistic practice, and participating actively in global institutional and digital infrastructures.
As Bazin argued, cinema’s unique power is to reflect reality while simultaneously offering a lens through which to interrogate it. French cinema exemplifies this dual role, maintaining its relevance not merely as a matter of heritage but as a living, evolving practice. In a media environment increasingly dominated by formula and algorithm, French cinema persists as a vital counterpoint: a reminder that film remains, at its core, both an art form and a universal language of human experience.